Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 18 - 23, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1269630

Abstract

References

  • Şenol, H. İ., Yiğit, A. Y., Kaya, Y., & Ulvi A. (2021). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik veri füzyonu ile kültürel mirasın 3 boyutlu (3B) modelleme uygulaması: Kanlıdivane Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3(1), 29-36.
  • Şanlıoğlu, İ., Zeybek, M., & Karauğuz, G. (2013). Photogrammetric survey and 3D modeling of Ivriz rock relief in Late Hittite Era. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry, 13(2), 147-157.
  • Yiğit, A. Y., & Ulvi, A. (2020). İHA fotogrametrisi tekniği kullanarak 3B model oluşturma: Yakutiye Medresesi Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(2), 46-54.
  • Karasaka, L., Makineci, H. B., & Erdal, K. (2023). Accuracy assessment toward mergıng of terrestrıal laser scanner poınt data and unmanned aerıal system poınt data. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(1), 124-135.
  • Karasaka, L., & Beg, A. A. R. (2021). Yersel lazer tarama yöntemi ile farklı geometrik yapıdaki özelliklerin modellenmesi. Geomatik, 6(1), 54-60.
  • Sun, P., Zhou, F., Sun, J., & Wang, L. (2021). High-accuracy three-dimensional measurement based on multi-directional cooperative target with weighted SfM algorithm. Measurement, 172, 108955.
  • Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A., & Kaya, Y. (2019). The use of photogrammetric techniques in documenting cultural heritage: The Example of Aksaray Selime Sultan Tomb. Universal Journal of Engineering Science, 7(3), 64-73.
  • Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. Y., & Kaya, Y. (2020). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik teknikler kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilise’nin 3 Boyutlu nokta bulutu ve modelinin üretilmesi. Geomatik, 5(1), 22-30.
  • Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y., & Alptekin, A. (2022). Discontinuity set extraction from 3D point clouds obtained by UAV Photogrammetry in a rockfall site. Survey Review, 1-13.
  • Makineci, H. B. (2016). İnsansız hava araçları lidar etkileşimi. Geomatik, 1(1), 19-23.
  • Yao, Z., Zhao, Q., Li, X., & Bi, Q. (2021). Point cloud registration algorithm based on curvature feature similarity. Measurement, 177, 109274.
  • Wakisaka, E., Moribe, Y., & Kanai, S. (2019). TLS point cloud registration based on ICP algorithm using point quality. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 963-968.
  • Si, H., Qiu, J., & Li, Y. (2022). A review of point cloud registration algorithms for laser scanners: applications in large-scale aircraft measurement. Applied Sciences, 12(20), 10247.
  • Yılmaz, H. M., & Yakar, M. (2006). Yersel lazer tarama Teknolojisi. Yapı teknolojileri Elektronik dergisi, 2(2), 43-48.
  • Demir, M. N., & Altun, Y. (2020). Otonom Araçla Genetik Algoritma Kullanılarak Haritalama ve Lokasyon. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8(1), 654-666.
  • Begum, M., Mann, G. K., & Gosine, R. G. (2008). Integrated fuzzy logic and genetic algorithmic approach for simultaneous localization and mapping of mobile robots. Applied Soft Computing, 8(1), 150-165.
  • Sualeh, M., & Kim, G. W. (2019). Simultaneous localization and mapping in the epoch of semantics: a survey. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 17(3), 729-742.
  • Tavani, S., Billi, A., Corradetti, A., Mercuri, M., Bosman, A., Cuffaro, M., ... & Carminati, E. (2022). Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones. Earth-Science Reviews, 227, 103969.
  • Ahmadabadian, A. H., Yazdan, R., Karami, A., Moradi, M., & Ghorbani, F. (2017). Clustering and selecting vantage images in a low-cost system for 3D reconstruction of texture-less objects. Measurement, 99, 185-191.
  • Yakar, M., & Dogan, Y. (2019). 3D Reconstruction of Residential Areas with SfM Photogrammetry. In Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications: Proceedings of the 1st Springer Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences (CAJG-1), Tunisia 2018 (pp. 73-75). Springer International Publishing.
  • Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). 3D model of Üçayak Ruins obtained from point clouds. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(2), 37-40.
  • Mohammed, O., & Yakar, M. (2016). Yersel Fotogrametrik Yöntem İle İbadethanelerin Modellenmesi. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 15(2), 85-95.
  • Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., Karataş, L., & Yakar, M. (2022). The use of UAV photogrammetry in modeling ancient structures: A case study of “Kanytellis”. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 41-50.
  • Alyilmaz, C., Alyilmaz, S., & Yakar, M. (2010). Measurement of petroglyhps (rock of arts) of Qobustan with close range photogrammetry. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(Part 5), 29-32.
  • Korumaz, A. G., Dülgerler, O. N., & Yakar, M. (2011). Kültürel mirasin belgelenmesinde dijital yaklaşimlar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 26(3), 67-83.

Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations

Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 18 - 23, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1269630

Abstract

Photogrammetric techniques are widely used to represent the characteristics of historical buildings in the digital environment in the closest way to reality. Terrestrial photogrammetric methods have needed different alternatives in recent years to produce 3D models that offer high reality. In recent years, producing point data with the Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) images, and alternative methods such as the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithm has become popular. Aligning point data from different approaches and making 3D models create new problems. Primarily, it is necessary to investigate the operations performed manually by the operator over time. Also, it is needed to explore the integration of automatic algorithms such as Iterative Closest Point (ICP) in terms of accuracy. In this research, point data of the Dokuz Historical Bridge was produced using different aligning techniques manually and automatically with the ICP algorithm. The assessment has been done from the results of combined point data over time and accuracy. In both UAV-TLS and UAV-SLAM aligning procedures, spatial accuracy was determined as 2.8cm and 4cm, respectively, in the operations performed by the operator and 46cm and 12cm in the procedures performed automatically by ICP. As a result, it was determined that the operators combined produced better findings, especially in research including coordinate transform.

References

  • Şenol, H. İ., Yiğit, A. Y., Kaya, Y., & Ulvi A. (2021). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik veri füzyonu ile kültürel mirasın 3 boyutlu (3B) modelleme uygulaması: Kanlıdivane Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3(1), 29-36.
  • Şanlıoğlu, İ., Zeybek, M., & Karauğuz, G. (2013). Photogrammetric survey and 3D modeling of Ivriz rock relief in Late Hittite Era. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry, 13(2), 147-157.
  • Yiğit, A. Y., & Ulvi, A. (2020). İHA fotogrametrisi tekniği kullanarak 3B model oluşturma: Yakutiye Medresesi Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(2), 46-54.
  • Karasaka, L., Makineci, H. B., & Erdal, K. (2023). Accuracy assessment toward mergıng of terrestrıal laser scanner poınt data and unmanned aerıal system poınt data. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(1), 124-135.
  • Karasaka, L., & Beg, A. A. R. (2021). Yersel lazer tarama yöntemi ile farklı geometrik yapıdaki özelliklerin modellenmesi. Geomatik, 6(1), 54-60.
  • Sun, P., Zhou, F., Sun, J., & Wang, L. (2021). High-accuracy three-dimensional measurement based on multi-directional cooperative target with weighted SfM algorithm. Measurement, 172, 108955.
  • Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A., & Kaya, Y. (2019). The use of photogrammetric techniques in documenting cultural heritage: The Example of Aksaray Selime Sultan Tomb. Universal Journal of Engineering Science, 7(3), 64-73.
  • Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. Y., & Kaya, Y. (2020). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik teknikler kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilise’nin 3 Boyutlu nokta bulutu ve modelinin üretilmesi. Geomatik, 5(1), 22-30.
  • Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y., & Alptekin, A. (2022). Discontinuity set extraction from 3D point clouds obtained by UAV Photogrammetry in a rockfall site. Survey Review, 1-13.
  • Makineci, H. B. (2016). İnsansız hava araçları lidar etkileşimi. Geomatik, 1(1), 19-23.
  • Yao, Z., Zhao, Q., Li, X., & Bi, Q. (2021). Point cloud registration algorithm based on curvature feature similarity. Measurement, 177, 109274.
  • Wakisaka, E., Moribe, Y., & Kanai, S. (2019). TLS point cloud registration based on ICP algorithm using point quality. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 963-968.
  • Si, H., Qiu, J., & Li, Y. (2022). A review of point cloud registration algorithms for laser scanners: applications in large-scale aircraft measurement. Applied Sciences, 12(20), 10247.
  • Yılmaz, H. M., & Yakar, M. (2006). Yersel lazer tarama Teknolojisi. Yapı teknolojileri Elektronik dergisi, 2(2), 43-48.
  • Demir, M. N., & Altun, Y. (2020). Otonom Araçla Genetik Algoritma Kullanılarak Haritalama ve Lokasyon. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8(1), 654-666.
  • Begum, M., Mann, G. K., & Gosine, R. G. (2008). Integrated fuzzy logic and genetic algorithmic approach for simultaneous localization and mapping of mobile robots. Applied Soft Computing, 8(1), 150-165.
  • Sualeh, M., & Kim, G. W. (2019). Simultaneous localization and mapping in the epoch of semantics: a survey. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 17(3), 729-742.
  • Tavani, S., Billi, A., Corradetti, A., Mercuri, M., Bosman, A., Cuffaro, M., ... & Carminati, E. (2022). Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones. Earth-Science Reviews, 227, 103969.
  • Ahmadabadian, A. H., Yazdan, R., Karami, A., Moradi, M., & Ghorbani, F. (2017). Clustering and selecting vantage images in a low-cost system for 3D reconstruction of texture-less objects. Measurement, 99, 185-191.
  • Yakar, M., & Dogan, Y. (2019). 3D Reconstruction of Residential Areas with SfM Photogrammetry. In Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications: Proceedings of the 1st Springer Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences (CAJG-1), Tunisia 2018 (pp. 73-75). Springer International Publishing.
  • Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). 3D model of Üçayak Ruins obtained from point clouds. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(2), 37-40.
  • Mohammed, O., & Yakar, M. (2016). Yersel Fotogrametrik Yöntem İle İbadethanelerin Modellenmesi. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 15(2), 85-95.
  • Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., Karataş, L., & Yakar, M. (2022). The use of UAV photogrammetry in modeling ancient structures: A case study of “Kanytellis”. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 41-50.
  • Alyilmaz, C., Alyilmaz, S., & Yakar, M. (2010). Measurement of petroglyhps (rock of arts) of Qobustan with close range photogrammetry. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(Part 5), 29-32.
  • Korumaz, A. G., Dülgerler, O. N., & Yakar, M. (2011). Kültürel mirasin belgelenmesinde dijital yaklaşimlar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 26(3), 67-83.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Kasım Erdal 0000-0001-6024-7361

Hasan Bilgehan Makineci 0000-0003-3627-5826

Early Pub Date May 27, 2023
Publication Date June 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Erdal, K., & Makineci, H. B. (2023). Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 5(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1269630
AMA Erdal K, Makineci HB. Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations. MEPHOJ. June 2023;5(1):18-23. doi:10.53093/mephoj.1269630
Chicago Erdal, Kasım, and Hasan Bilgehan Makineci. “Adaptation Analysis of Produced 3D Models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS Data Combinations”. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal 5, no. 1 (June 2023): 18-23. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1269630.
EndNote Erdal K, Makineci HB (June 1, 2023) Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal 5 1 18–23.
IEEE K. Erdal and H. B. Makineci, “Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations”, MEPHOJ, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2023, doi: 10.53093/mephoj.1269630.
ISNAD Erdal, Kasım - Makineci, Hasan Bilgehan. “Adaptation Analysis of Produced 3D Models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS Data Combinations”. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal 5/1 (June 2023), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1269630.
JAMA Erdal K, Makineci HB. Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations. MEPHOJ. 2023;5:18–23.
MLA Erdal, Kasım and Hasan Bilgehan Makineci. “Adaptation Analysis of Produced 3D Models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS Data Combinations”. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, pp. 18-23, doi:10.53093/mephoj.1269630.
Vancouver Erdal K, Makineci HB. Adaptation analysis of produced 3D models from UAV-SLAM and UAV-TLS data combinations. MEPHOJ. 2023;5(1):18-23.