Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 1 - 8, 25.09.2020

Mehmet Yüce Musa Eşit

Abstract

SPI (Standartlaştırılmış Yağış İndeksi) ve SPEI (Normalleştirilmiş Yağış-Buharlaşma İndeksi), Ceyhan Havzasının aylık meteorolojik veriler kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Veri kümesinin bütünlüğüne ve uzunluğuna göre, bu çalışmada 1963'ten 2016'ya kadar 8 meteoroloji istasyonunun aylık verileri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre, SPI ve SPEI 1- ve 3-aylık zaman serilerinde 0.83

Keywords

: SPI SPEI Ceyhan Havzası Korelasyon

References

  • Aksoy, H., Onoz, B., Cetin, M., Yuce, M. I., Eris, E., Selek, B., ... & Cavus, Y., 2018. SPI-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Izmır, Turkey (pp. 12-14).
  • Assembly, U. G., 1994. Elaboration of an International Convention to Combat Desertification in countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. AC, 241, 27.
  • Aswathanarayana, U., 2001. Water resources management and the environment. CRC Press.
  • Beran, M. And Rodier, J.A., 1985. Hydrological aspects of drought, Studies and reports in hydrology 39, UNESCO-WMO, Paris, France.
  • Çetin, M., Aksoy, H., Önöz, B., Eriş, E., İshak, M., Yüce, B. S., ... & Orta, S., 2018. Deriving Accumulated Precipitation Deficits from Drought Severity-Duration-Frequency Curves: A Case Study in Adana Province, Turkey. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE-BİLİM KURULU, 39.
  • Eris, E., Aksoy, H., Onoz, B., Cetin, M., Yuce, M. I., Selek, B., ... & Karakus, E. U., 2019. Frequency analysis of low flows in intermittent and non-intermittent rivers from hydrological basins in Turkey. Water Supply, 19(1), 30-39.
  • Ganguli, P., & Reddy, M. J., 2014. Evaluation of trends and multivariate frequency analysis of droughts in three meteorological subdivisions of western India. International Journal of Climatology, 34(3), 911-928.
  • Gillette, H. P., 1950. A creeping drought under way. Water and sewage works, 104 (5).
  • Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., Wardlow, B. D., Anderson, M. C., & Kogan, F., 2012. Drought monitoring: Historical and current perspectives.
  • Heim Jr, R. R., 2002. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), 1149-1166.
  • Lettenmaier, D. P., McCabe, G., & Stakhiv, E. Z., 1996. Global climate change: effects on hydrologic cycle. Water resources handbook, 29-1.
  • Linsely Jr., R.K., Kohler, M.A., Paulhus, J.L.H., 1958. Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York.
  • MacMahon, T. A., Arenas, D. A., 1982. Methods of Computation of Low Streamflow. Studies and Reports in Hydrology, 36-94.
  • McKee, T. B., 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple time scales. In Proceedings of 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, Boston, 1995.
  • McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J., 1993, January. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (Vol. 17, No. 22, pp. 179-183).
  • Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P., 2010. A review of drought concepts. Journal of hydrology, 391(1-2), 202-216.
  • Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı (OSİB)., 2018. Ceyhan havzası taşkın yönetim planı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/Ta%C5%9Fk%C4%B1n%20Y%C3%B6netim%20Planlar%C4%B1/3)%20CEYHAN%20%20HAVZASI%20TA%C5%9EKIN%20YONETIM%20PLANI.pdf
  • Palmer, W.C., 1965. Meteorological drought, Research Paper No. 45, US Weather Bureau,Washington, D.C., USA. Schneider, S.H. (Ed.), 1996. Encyclopaedia of Climate and Weather. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations., 1983. The State of Food and Agriculture, World review: the situation in Sub-Saharan Africa Women in developing agriculture, 1-240.
  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S., & López-Moreno, J. I., 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of climate, 23(7), 1696-1718.
  • Yevjevich, V. M., 1967. Objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts, An. Hydrology papers (Colorado State University); no. 23.
  • Yu, M., Li, Q., Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., & Heim, R. R., 2014. Are droughts becoming more frequent or severe in China based on the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index: 1951–2010?. International Journal of Climatology, 34(3), 545-558.
  • Yuce, M. I., Esit, M., & Karatas, M. C., 2019. Hydraulic geometry analysis of Ceyhan River, Turkey. SN Applied Sciences, 1(7), 763.
  • Wable, P. S., Jha, M. K., & Shekhar, A., 2019. Comparison of drought indices in a semi-Arid River Basin of India. Water resources management, 33(1), 75-102.
  • Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H., 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water international, 10(3), 111-120.
  • World Meteorological Organization., 1986. Report of the international conference on the assessment of the role of carbon dioxide and of other greenhouse gases in climate variations and associated impacts.

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 1 - 8, 25.09.2020

Mehmet Yüce Musa Eşit

Abstract

References

  • Aksoy, H., Onoz, B., Cetin, M., Yuce, M. I., Eris, E., Selek, B., ... & Cavus, Y., 2018. SPI-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Izmır, Turkey (pp. 12-14).
  • Assembly, U. G., 1994. Elaboration of an International Convention to Combat Desertification in countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa. AC, 241, 27.
  • Aswathanarayana, U., 2001. Water resources management and the environment. CRC Press.
  • Beran, M. And Rodier, J.A., 1985. Hydrological aspects of drought, Studies and reports in hydrology 39, UNESCO-WMO, Paris, France.
  • Çetin, M., Aksoy, H., Önöz, B., Eriş, E., İshak, M., Yüce, B. S., ... & Orta, S., 2018. Deriving Accumulated Precipitation Deficits from Drought Severity-Duration-Frequency Curves: A Case Study in Adana Province, Turkey. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE-BİLİM KURULU, 39.
  • Eris, E., Aksoy, H., Onoz, B., Cetin, M., Yuce, M. I., Selek, B., ... & Karakus, E. U., 2019. Frequency analysis of low flows in intermittent and non-intermittent rivers from hydrological basins in Turkey. Water Supply, 19(1), 30-39.
  • Ganguli, P., & Reddy, M. J., 2014. Evaluation of trends and multivariate frequency analysis of droughts in three meteorological subdivisions of western India. International Journal of Climatology, 34(3), 911-928.
  • Gillette, H. P., 1950. A creeping drought under way. Water and sewage works, 104 (5).
  • Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., Wardlow, B. D., Anderson, M. C., & Kogan, F., 2012. Drought monitoring: Historical and current perspectives.
  • Heim Jr, R. R., 2002. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), 1149-1166.
  • Lettenmaier, D. P., McCabe, G., & Stakhiv, E. Z., 1996. Global climate change: effects on hydrologic cycle. Water resources handbook, 29-1.
  • Linsely Jr., R.K., Kohler, M.A., Paulhus, J.L.H., 1958. Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York.
  • MacMahon, T. A., Arenas, D. A., 1982. Methods of Computation of Low Streamflow. Studies and Reports in Hydrology, 36-94.
  • McKee, T. B., 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple time scales. In Proceedings of 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, Boston, 1995.
  • McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J., 1993, January. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (Vol. 17, No. 22, pp. 179-183).
  • Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P., 2010. A review of drought concepts. Journal of hydrology, 391(1-2), 202-216.
  • Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı (OSİB)., 2018. Ceyhan havzası taşkın yönetim planı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/Ta%C5%9Fk%C4%B1n%20Y%C3%B6netim%20Planlar%C4%B1/3)%20CEYHAN%20%20HAVZASI%20TA%C5%9EKIN%20YONETIM%20PLANI.pdf
  • Palmer, W.C., 1965. Meteorological drought, Research Paper No. 45, US Weather Bureau,Washington, D.C., USA. Schneider, S.H. (Ed.), 1996. Encyclopaedia of Climate and Weather. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations., 1983. The State of Food and Agriculture, World review: the situation in Sub-Saharan Africa Women in developing agriculture, 1-240.
  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S., & López-Moreno, J. I., 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of climate, 23(7), 1696-1718.
  • Yevjevich, V. M., 1967. Objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts, An. Hydrology papers (Colorado State University); no. 23.
  • Yu, M., Li, Q., Hayes, M. J., Svoboda, M. D., & Heim, R. R., 2014. Are droughts becoming more frequent or severe in China based on the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index: 1951–2010?. International Journal of Climatology, 34(3), 545-558.
  • Yuce, M. I., Esit, M., & Karatas, M. C., 2019. Hydraulic geometry analysis of Ceyhan River, Turkey. SN Applied Sciences, 1(7), 763.
  • Wable, P. S., Jha, M. K., & Shekhar, A., 2019. Comparison of drought indices in a semi-Arid River Basin of India. Water resources management, 33(1), 75-102.
  • Wilhite, D. A., & Glantz, M. H., 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water international, 10(3), 111-120.
  • World Meteorological Organization., 1986. Report of the international conference on the assessment of the role of carbon dioxide and of other greenhouse gases in climate variations and associated impacts.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Civil Engineering
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Yüce This is me 0000-0002-6267-9528

Musa Eşit 0000-0003-4509-7283

Publication Date September 25, 2020
Submission Date April 29, 2020
Acceptance Date August 24, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yüce, M., & Eşit, M. (2020). Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi. Su Kaynakları, 5(2), 1-8.
AMA Yüce M, Eşit M. Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi. Su Kaynakları. September 2020;5(2):1-8.
Chicago Yüce, Mehmet, and Musa Eşit. “Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI Ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi”. Su Kaynakları 5, no. 2 (September 2020): 1-8.
EndNote Yüce M, Eşit M (September 1, 2020) Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi. Su Kaynakları 5 2 1–8.
IEEE M. Yüce and M. Eşit, “Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi”, Su Kaynakları, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2020.
ISNAD Yüce, Mehmet - Eşit, Musa. “Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI Ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi”. Su Kaynakları 5/2 (September 2020), 1-8.
JAMA Yüce M, Eşit M. Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi. Su Kaynakları. 2020;5:1–8.
MLA Yüce, Mehmet and Musa Eşit. “Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI Ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi”. Su Kaynakları, vol. 5, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1-8.
Vancouver Yüce M, Eşit M. Ceyhan Havzasının Kuraklık Risk Haritasının SPI ve SPEI Metotları İle Belirlenmesi. Su Kaynakları. 2020;5(2):1-8.
 Download Cover Image