Yıl 2020, Cilt 23 , Sayı 1, Sayfalar 9 - 21 2020-03-29

INVESTIGATION OF KAHRAMANMARAS BUILDING STOCK BY P25 RAPID EVALUATION METHOD
P25 METODU İLE KAHRAMANMARAŞ YAPI STOĞUNUN İNCELENMESİ

Ökkeş Alper ERŞAHAN [1] , Mehmet Metin KÖSE [2] , Sila AVĞIN [3]


In this study, it is aimed to examine the building stock in Kahramanmaras province by rapid evaluation method. In order to have knowledge of the earthquake safety of many buildings in a short period of time, the building stock was inspected by P25 rapid evaluation method which is one of the rapid evaluation methods.342 buildings are selected from public and private buildings in Kahramanmaras province to represent all buildings in the city. In the survey, the buildings were scored over 100 points, buildings blow 25 points entered a very risky group, buildings between 25 and 35 points buildings were assessed in the detailed examination band, above 35 points buildings were evaluated in the low risk group. Of the 342 buildings examined, 100 were in the high-risk group; 121 were in the detailed examination band and 121 were in the low-risk group.

Bu çalışmada Kahramanmaraş ilindeki yapı stoğunun hızlı değerlendirme yöntemi ile incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Kısa sürede birçok yapının deprem güvenliği hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak amacıyla yapı stoğunun incelenmesi hızlı değerlendirme yöntemlerinden biri olan P25 hızlı değerlendirme yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Kahramanmaraş ilinde bulunan kamu binalarından ve özel binalardan ildeki bütün binaları temsil edecek şekilde 342 adet bina seçilmiştir. İncelemede binaların 100 üzerinden puanlamaya tabi tutarak 25 puanın altındaki binalar çok riskli gruba; 25 ila 35 puan arasındaki binalar, ayrıntılı inceleme bandında; 35 puandan yüksek binalar az riskli grupta değerlendirilmiştir. İncelenen 342 adet binadan 100 tanesi çok riskli grupta 121 tanesi ayrıntılı inceleme bandında 121 tanesi az riskli grupta çıkmıştır.

  • ATC-21 : Applied Technology Council. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington DC.
  • Athanassiadou C J, Penelis G G, and Kappos A J (1994) “Seismic Response of Adjacent Buildings with Similar or Different Dynamic Chracteristics”, Earthquake Spectra, 10(2):293-317.
  • Bal, İ. E., Ozdemir, Z. (2006) “The Adverse Effects of Perimeter Frame Discontinuity on Earthquake Response of RC Buildings”, 7th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, October 11-13, 2006, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Bal, İ.et al., 2007. “P25 Rapid Screening Method to Determine the Collpase Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16-20 October 2007 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Bal İ and et al., 2008. A New Approach For The Prelımınary Seısmıc Assessment Of Rc Buıldıngs: P25 Scorıng Method, The 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
  • Boduroğlu, M. Hasan et al., 2007 “'' A Screening Method for Evaluating Existing Structures '' Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering .16-20 October 2007, Istanbul. 10p.
  • Celik O. C., İlki A., Yalcın C., Yüksel E., October 2007 “An Experience on Rapid Assessment of Earthquake Risk of Different Type Buildings in Eastern and Western European Countries ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul.
  • Dogan, Meltem, 2012. P25 and Durtes Pre-evaluation Methods and Application to Damaged Buildings in 1999 Düzce Earthquake, Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.213p.
  • FEMA 154, 1988. Rapid Visal Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards. A Handbook, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
  • Gulay, Gulten et al., 2008, Calibration of P25 Scoring Method Developed for Earthquake Safety of Buildings and Pilot Zone Application, TUBITAK Project (106M278), Istanbul, 129p.
  • Hassan, Ahmed F. and Sozen, Mete A., Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Buildings in Regions with Infrequent Earthquakes, ACI Structural Journal, January - February 1997. 31-39,
  • İnel M., Bilgin H., Ozmen H. B., May 2006 “Performance Evaluation of Existing Public Buildings "TMH - Turkey Engineering News / Issue 444-4445, 4- 5.17p
  • Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, 1990, “Standart For Evaluation of Seismic Capacity of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Tokyo. 8s.
  • Oztorun N. K., vd. 2004 “Integration of Durtes and General Purpose Finite Elements with Expert Computer Program for Rapid Detection of Structures’’ İMO Seventeenth Technical Congress and Exhibition.13s.
  • P. Gulkan, A. Yakut, H. Sucuoğlu, M. S. Yucemen, E. Çıtıpıtıoglu, Damage Detection Form for Engineering Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, ODTU, Ankara, (1994).
  • Sucuoglu H and Yazgan U (2003) “Simple Survey Procedures for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks”
  • Wasti ST, Ozcebe G (ed.) of Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Earth and Environmental Sciences, (29): 97-118.
  • Sucuoglu H., October 2007 “Determination of Earthquake Risks in Urban Building Stocks by Street Scanning Method ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul
  • Tezcan S., Bal İ. E., Ozdemir Z., Kucuk F., September 2005 “How to provide “zero Kay loss of life in earthquake?”Construction Site Construction Machinery and Architecture Magazine, Number: 232, Pg: 108-112.
  • Yakut A., 2012 “Rapid Seismic Assessment Procedures for Turkish Building Stock” Seismic Engineering Research Infrastructures for European Synergies, Series Workshop Role of Research Infrastructures in Seismic Rehabilitation, February 2012, Istanbul.65p
  • Youd T L, Iddriss I M, Andrus R D, Arango I, Castro G, Christian J T, Dobry R, Liam Finn W D, Harder L F, Hynes M E, Ishihara K, Koester J P, Liao S S C, Marcuson II W F, Martin G R, Mitchell J K, Moriwaki Y, Power M S, Robertson P K, Seed R B, and Sotokoe K H (2001) “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10):817-833.
  • Tuysuz, Selim, 2007. Determination of Breakdown Risk of Reinforced Concrete Buildings by Rapid Assessment Methods: P25 Scoring Method, Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.120p.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular İnşaat Mühendisliği
Bölüm İnşaat Mühendisliği
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-2934-2878
Yazar: Ökkeş Alper ERŞAHAN
Kurum: KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-7462-1577
Yazar: Mehmet Metin KÖSE (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-4102-7747
Yazar: Sila AVĞIN
Kurum: KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK-MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Başvuru Tarihi : 17 Eylül 2019
Kabul Tarihi : 29 Ocak 2020
Yayımlanma Tarihi : 29 Mart 2020

APA ERŞAHAN, Ö , KÖSE, M , AVĞIN, S . (2020). P25 METODU İLE KAHRAMANMARAŞ YAPI STOĞUNUN İNCELENMESİ. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi , 23 (1) , 9-21 . DOI: 10.17780/ksujes.621333