Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Uçan Kanat Tipi İHA'larda Kanat Profillerinin Aerodinamik Performans Karşılaştırması

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 123 - 127, 06.07.2023

Seyhun Durmuş

https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1169652

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, kanat profili seçiminin uçan kanat İHA'ların aerodinamik özelliklerini nasıl etkilediğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla MH 60, TL54, Eppler 339 ve TsAGI %12 kanat profilleri için karşılaştırmalı analizler yapılmıştır. Maksimum menzil performansı (maksimum kaldırma / sürükleme oranı) göz önüne alındığında, en iyi aerodinamik verimi MH 60 ve TL54 kanat profilinden yapılmış uçan kanatlı İHA vermektedir. MH 60 kanat profili ile uçan kanatta maksimum L/D oranı 33,1'dir, bu değer TL 54 kanat profili ile 32.7 uçan kanattır. Eppler 339 ile uçan kanat, TsAGI %12 ile uçan kanada kıyasla negatif hücum açılarında daha avantajlıdır. Eğim momenti katsayısı dikkate alındığında TsAGI %12 ile MH60 kanat profilinden yapılan uçan kanat TL 54 ve Eppler 339'a göre daha stabil bir özellik göstermektedir. Çalışma sonucunda TL 54 e MH60 airfoile sahip uçan kanat İHA, maksimum menzil, minimum iniş hızı ve maksimum dayanıklılık performansı açısından Eppler 339 ve TsAGI %12'den daha iyi performans gösterdi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

uçan kanat TL 54 MH60 XFLR5 kuyruksuz uçak

Kaynakça

  • [1] Reid, M., & Kozak, J. (2006, August). Thin/Cambered/Reflexed Airfoil Development for Micro Air Vechhicle Applications at Reynolds Numbers of 60,000 to 100,000. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit (p. 6508).
  • [2] Hepperle, M. (2004). Airfoil design for light tailless airplanes.
  • [3] Eppler, R. (1990). Airfoil data. In Airfoil Design and Data (pp. 163-512). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  • [4] Alsahlan, A. A., & Rahulan, T. (2017). Aerofoil design for unmanned high-altitude aft-swept flying wings. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 335-345.
  • [5] Shams, T. A., Shah, S. I. A., Javed, A., & Hamdani, S. H. R. (2020). Airfoil Selection Procedure, Wind Tunnel Experimentation and Implementation of 6DOF Modeling on a Flying Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle. Micromachines, 11(6), 553.
  • [6] Mokhtar, W. (2005). A numerical parametric study of high-lift low reynolds number airfoils. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (p. 1355).
  • [7] Prisacariu, V., Boşcoianu, C., Circiu, I., & Boşcoianu, M. (2015). The Limits of Downsizing-A Critical Analysis of the Limits of the Agile Flying Wing MiniUAV. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 772, pp. 424-429). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
  • [8] Dinh, B. A., & Ngo, H. K. (2016). An efficient low-speed airfoil design optimization process using multi-fidelity analysis for UAV flying wing. Science and Technology Development Journal, 19(3), 43-52.
  • [9] Pate, D. J., & German, B. (2014). Planform optimization of a flying wing with a solid homogeneous structure. In 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 2868).
  • [10] Wong, S. M., Ho, H. W., & Abdullah, M. Z. (2021). Design and fabrication of a dual rotor-embedded wing vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicle. Unmanned Systems, 9(01), 45-63.
  • [11] Ahn, J., & Lee, D. (2012). A computational study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying-wing MAV design. In 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 2773).
  • [12] Martinez-Val, R., Perez, E., Puertas, J., & Roa, J. (2010). Optimization of planform and cruise conditions of a transport flying wing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 224(12), 1243-1251.
  • [13] Bronz, M., Hattenberger, G., & Moschetta, J. M. (2013). Development of a long endurance mini-uav: Eternity. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 5(4), 261-272.
  • [14] Baghdasaryan, A. (2019). Design of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with a Mass-Actuated Control System (Bachelor's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya).
  • [15] Pan, Y., Huang, J., Li, F., & Yan, C. (2017). Application of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization on Advanced Configuration Aircraft. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 63-70.
  • [16] Kelayeh, R. K., & Djavareshkian, M. H. (2021). Aerodynamic investigation of twist angle variation based on wing smarting for a flying wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(2), 201-216.
  • [17] Song, L., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Huang, J. (2014). Dihedral influence on lateral–directional dynamic stability on large aspect ratio tailless flying wing aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 27(5), 1149-1155.
  • [18] Xu, X., & Zhou, Z. (2015). Study on longitudinal stability improvement of flying wing aircraft based on synthetic jet flow control. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46, 287-298.
  • [19] Gatto, A., Bourdin, P., & Friswell, M. I. (2010). Experimental investigation into articulated winglet effects on flying wing surface pressure aerodynamics. Journal of Aircraft, 47(5), 1811-1815.
  • [20] Wang, G., Hu, Y., & Wu, C. (2013). Improving Performance of Flying Wing Mini-UAV with Propeller Thrust Involved Trimming the Pitching Moment. In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 4421).

Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 123 - 127, 06.07.2023

Seyhun Durmuş

https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1169652

Öz

The aim of the study is to investigate how the choice of airfoil affects the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying wing UAV. For this purpose, comparative analyzes were performed for four different airfoils: MH60, TL54, Eppler 339, and TsAGI 12%. Given the maximum range performance (maximum lift /drag ratio), the best aerodynamic efficiency is given by the flying wing UAV with MH60 and TL54 airfoil. Based on their maximum lift-to-drag ratio, the flying wing UAVs made with MH60 and TL54 airfoils exhibited the best aerodynamic efficiency. Specifically, the maximum lift-to-drag ratio for the flying wing with the MH60 airfoil was 33.1, while that for the flying wing with the TL54 airfoil was 32.7. Considering the pitching moment coefficient, the flying wing made with the MH60 airfoil and TsAGI 12% exhibited a more stable characteristic than the TL54 and Eppler 339 airfoils. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the flying wing UAVs made with the TL54 and MH60 airfoils outperformed those made with the Eppler 339 and TsAGI 12% airfoils in terms of maximum range, minimum descent rate, and maximum endurance performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

tailles aircraft flying wing TL 54 MH60 XFLR5

Kaynakça

  • [1] Reid, M., & Kozak, J. (2006, August). Thin/Cambered/Reflexed Airfoil Development for Micro Air Vechhicle Applications at Reynolds Numbers of 60,000 to 100,000. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit (p. 6508).
  • [2] Hepperle, M. (2004). Airfoil design for light tailless airplanes.
  • [3] Eppler, R. (1990). Airfoil data. In Airfoil Design and Data (pp. 163-512). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  • [4] Alsahlan, A. A., & Rahulan, T. (2017). Aerofoil design for unmanned high-altitude aft-swept flying wings. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 335-345.
  • [5] Shams, T. A., Shah, S. I. A., Javed, A., & Hamdani, S. H. R. (2020). Airfoil Selection Procedure, Wind Tunnel Experimentation and Implementation of 6DOF Modeling on a Flying Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle. Micromachines, 11(6), 553.
  • [6] Mokhtar, W. (2005). A numerical parametric study of high-lift low reynolds number airfoils. In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (p. 1355).
  • [7] Prisacariu, V., Boşcoianu, C., Circiu, I., & Boşcoianu, M. (2015). The Limits of Downsizing-A Critical Analysis of the Limits of the Agile Flying Wing MiniUAV. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 772, pp. 424-429). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
  • [8] Dinh, B. A., & Ngo, H. K. (2016). An efficient low-speed airfoil design optimization process using multi-fidelity analysis for UAV flying wing. Science and Technology Development Journal, 19(3), 43-52.
  • [9] Pate, D. J., & German, B. (2014). Planform optimization of a flying wing with a solid homogeneous structure. In 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 2868).
  • [10] Wong, S. M., Ho, H. W., & Abdullah, M. Z. (2021). Design and fabrication of a dual rotor-embedded wing vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicle. Unmanned Systems, 9(01), 45-63.
  • [11] Ahn, J., & Lee, D. (2012). A computational study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying-wing MAV design. In 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. 2773).
  • [12] Martinez-Val, R., Perez, E., Puertas, J., & Roa, J. (2010). Optimization of planform and cruise conditions of a transport flying wing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 224(12), 1243-1251.
  • [13] Bronz, M., Hattenberger, G., & Moschetta, J. M. (2013). Development of a long endurance mini-uav: Eternity. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 5(4), 261-272.
  • [14] Baghdasaryan, A. (2019). Design of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with a Mass-Actuated Control System (Bachelor's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya).
  • [15] Pan, Y., Huang, J., Li, F., & Yan, C. (2017). Application of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization on Advanced Configuration Aircraft. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 63-70.
  • [16] Kelayeh, R. K., & Djavareshkian, M. H. (2021). Aerodynamic investigation of twist angle variation based on wing smarting for a flying wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(2), 201-216.
  • [17] Song, L., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Huang, J. (2014). Dihedral influence on lateral–directional dynamic stability on large aspect ratio tailless flying wing aircraft. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 27(5), 1149-1155.
  • [18] Xu, X., & Zhou, Z. (2015). Study on longitudinal stability improvement of flying wing aircraft based on synthetic jet flow control. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46, 287-298.
  • [19] Gatto, A., Bourdin, P., & Friswell, M. I. (2010). Experimental investigation into articulated winglet effects on flying wing surface pressure aerodynamics. Journal of Aircraft, 47(5), 1811-1815.
  • [20] Wang, G., Hu, Y., & Wu, C. (2013). Improving Performance of Flying Wing Mini-UAV with Propeller Thrust Involved Trimming the Pitching Moment. In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. 4421).
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Seyhun Durmuş 0000-0002-1409-7355

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 6 Temmuz 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Durmuş, S. (2023). Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, 7(1), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1169652
AMA Durmuş S. Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV. ijiea, IJIEA. Temmuz 2023;7(1):123-127. doi:10.46460/ijiea.1169652
Chicago Durmuş, Seyhun. “Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 7, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2023): 123-27. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1169652.
EndNote Durmuş S (01 Temmuz 2023) Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 7 1 123–127.
IEEE S. Durmuş, “Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV”, ijiea, IJIEA, c. 7, sy. 1, ss. 123–127, 2023, doi: 10.46460/ijiea.1169652.
ISNAD Durmuş, Seyhun. “Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications 7/1 (Temmuz 2023), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1169652.
JAMA Durmuş S. Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV. ijiea, IJIEA. 2023;7:123–127.
MLA Durmuş, Seyhun. “Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV”. International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, c. 7, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 123-7, doi:10.46460/ijiea.1169652.
Vancouver Durmuş S. Aerodynamic Performance Comparison of Airfoils in Flying Wing UAV. ijiea, IJIEA. 2023;7(1):123-7.
 Kapak Resmi İndir