Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Environmental Impact of Foreign Direct Investment: A Bibliometric Analysis

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 14 - 37, 30.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1423924

Öz

The relationship between the environment and sustainable development is a highly valued and popular topic among the economists. This includes studies on the environmental consequences of foreign direct investments. Two main hypotheses, the pollution haven hypothesis and the pollution halo hypothesis, which reflect different perspectives on these consequences, are frequently discussed. The literature on the environmental impacts of FDI reveals a significant focus on the relationship between FDI and environmental quality, especially in the context of the pollution haven hypothesis. Understanding the dynamics of these hypotheses is of great importance for policymakers and economists to develop strategies that promote sustainable development by taking into account the interaction between global environmental policies and economic activities. In the study, bibliometric analysis was applied for 510 articles on the subject published in the WoS database for the period 2001-2023. According to the results of the analysis, the most frequently used keywords in the related articles are CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment and renewable energy. Authors such as Shahbaz, M., Hao, Y., Acheampong, Ao., Paramati, Sr. and Dong, K. produced the most articles on the topic and China was the most collaborated country in the articles. The most cited articles were produced in China, USA and Malaysia and the top three most cited articles were Tamazian et al., 2009; Balsalobre-Lorente et al., 2018; and Jalil and Feridun, 2011. The emerging themes are cdm (clean development mechanism) projects, deforestation, development spillovers, emission reduction technology, carbon leakage, club convergence, spillovers.

Kaynakça

  • Abbasi, M.A., Nosheen, M., & Rahman, H.U. (2023). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in asian countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 49270–49289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25548-x
  • Akçay, S., & Karasoy, A. (2018). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve karbondioksit emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73(2): 501– 526.
  • Al-Mulali, U. (2012). Factors affecting CO2 emission in the middle east: A panel data analysis. Energy, 44: 564–569.
  • Al-Nimer, M., Kayed, S., Ullah, R., Khan, N.U., & Khattak, M.S. (2022). Mapping the research between foreign direct ınvestment and environmental concerns; where are we and where to go? Sustainability, 14(24):16930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416930
  • Apergis, N., Pinar, M., & Unlu, E. (2023). How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30, 14680–14692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Asghari, M. (2013). Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences, 1(6), 92–100.
  • Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018). How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?, Energy Policy, 113(C), 356–367.
  • Bashir, M.F. (2022). Discovering the evolution of pollution haven hypothesis: A literature review and future research agenda. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29, 48210–48232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20782-1
  • Behera, S.R., & Dash, D.P. (2017). The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct ınvestment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 96–106.
  • Bilgen Karakurt, S. (2019). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve çevre: Türkiye için kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi testi, [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi].
  • Blanco, L., Gonzalez, F., & Ruiz, I. (2013). The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 41(1), 104–121.
  • Çınar, S., Yılmazer, M., & Fazhlar, T.A. (2012). Kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin ticareti ve çevre: gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler karşılaştırması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(2), 212–226.
  • Demir, H., & Erigüç, G. (2018). Bibliyometrik bir analiz ile yönetim düşünce sisteminin incelenmesi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.395214
  • Doytch, N. & Uçtum, M. (2016). Globalization and the environmental impact of FDI. City University of New York Economics Working Papers 12. https://academicworks.cuny .edu/gc_econ_wp/12/.
  • Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.
  • Güner, İ. (2019). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma çerçevesinde doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve Co2 ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği, [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi].
  • Hamid, K. (2016). Is foreign direct ınvestment a cause of environmental degradation in Pakistan? An ARDL approach to cointegration. Journal of Management and Research, 3(2): 60–76.
  • Huang, Y., Chen, X., Zhu, H., Huang, C., & Tian, Z. (2019). The heterogeneous effects of FDI and foreign trade on CO2 emissions: Evidence from China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–14.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
  • Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 33, 284–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003
  • Karasoy, A. (2015). Karbondioksit salımı ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlarla ilişkisi (1974-2012 Türkiye Örneği). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi].
  • Kaymak, H. (2005). Yabancı doğrudan yatırımları artırmak için teşvikler gerekli ve/veya yeterli mi?, Maliye Dergisi, 149, 74–104.
  • Kim, S-E., & Seok, J. H. (2023). The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions considering economic development: Evidence from South Korea. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2122538
  • Klivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emis consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct ınvestment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595–606.
  • Lee, J.W. (2013). The contribution of foreign direct ınvestment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 55, 483–489.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root test in panel data asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
  • Mert, M., & Bölük, G. (2016). Do foreign direct ınvestment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? new evidence from a panel ARDL approach to kyoto annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23(21), 21669–21681.
  • Ojewumi S.J., & Akinlo, A.E. (2017). Foreign direct ınvestment, economic growth and environmental quality in sub-saharan Africa: A dynamic model analysis. African Journal of Economic Review, 5(1), 48–68.
  • Ozkan, O., Coban, M.N., Iortile, I.B. vd. (2023). Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve, pollution haven, and pollution halo hypotheses with carbon efficiency in China: A dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 68163–68176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26671-5
  • Öztürk, Z., & Öz, D. (2016). The relationship between energy consumption, ıncome, foreign direct ınvestment, and CO2 emissions: The case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 269–288.
  • Pao, H.T., & Tsai, C.M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from A Panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.
  • Rafindadi, A.A., Muye, I.M., & Kaita, R.A. (2018). The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25, 126–137.
  • Seker, F., Ertugrul, H.M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct ınvestment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347–356.
  • Shaari, M.S., Hussain, N.E., Abdullah, H., & Kamil, S. (2014). Relationship among foreign direct ınvestment, economic growth and CO2 emission: A panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 706–715.
  • Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q.M.A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109-121.
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., & Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct ınvestment ımpede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics, 51, 275–287.
  • Sahin, D. (2018). Asya ülkelerinde CO2 emisyonu, doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları, ekonomik büyüme ve enerji tüketimi ilişkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(3): 210–218.
  • Şahinöz, A., & Fotourehchi, Z. (2014). Kirlilik emisyonu ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları: Türkiye için “kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi” testi. Sosyoekonomi, 10(21): 187–210.
  • Santos, A., & Forte, R. (2021). Environmental regulation and FDI attraction: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8873–8888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11091-6
  • Su, L., Yu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Global trends of carbon finance: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15(8):6784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086784
  • Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries, Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253.
  • Tamboğa, İ. (2019). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının çevre üzerinde etkisi: Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi çerçevesinde analizi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi].
  • Trinh, N.T.H. (2022). Bibliometric analysis to assess the relationship between foreign direct ınvestment, environmental emissions, and green economy, 29 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1986614/v1
  • Turzo, T., Marzi, G., Favino, C., & Terzani, S. (2022). Non-financial reporting research and practice: Lessons from the last decade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131154.
  • Uche, E., Omoke, P. C., Silva-Opuala, C., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Re-estimating the pollution haven–halo hypotheses for Brazil via a machine learning procedure. Journal of International Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3868
  • Xue, J., & Liu, Y. (2022) A bibliometric analysis of carbon finance based on web of science (WoS). American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.1212100.
  • Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Cooke, F.L. (2022). Low-carbon economy and policy implications: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29, 65432–65451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20381-0
  • Yaylalı, M, Dogan, E.M., Yılmaz, V.M., & Karaca, Z. (2015). The examination of relationship between foreign direct ınvestments and carbondioxide emissions in Turkey with ARDL approach. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2), 107–112.
  • Yılmaz, G. (2015). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye ve Co2 emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği (1974-2010). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi].
  • Yılmaz, T., Zeren, F., & Koyun, Y. (2017). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlar, ekonomik büyüme ve karbondioksit emisyonu ilişkisi: BRICS ve MINT ülkeleri üzerinde ekonometrik bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1235–1254.

Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Çevresel Etkisi: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 14 - 37, 30.04.2024
https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1423924

Öz

Çevre ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma arasındaki ilişki, ekonomistler arasında büyük önem verilen ve ilgi gören bir konudur. Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların çevresel sonuçları hakkında yapılan çalışmalar da bu kapsamdadır. Bu sonuçlara dair farklı bakış açıları olmakla birlikte, kirlilik cenneti hipotezi ve kirlilik halesi hipotezi olmak üzere iki ana hipotez sıklıkla tartışılmaktadır. DYY'nin çevresel etkileri üzerine yapılan literatür, özellikle kirlilik cenneti hipotezi bağlamında DYY ve çevresel kalite arasındaki ilişkiye önemli ölçüde odaklanıldığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu hipotezlerin dinamiklerini anlamak, politika yapıcılar ve ekonomistler için küresel çevre politikaları ve ekonomik faaliyetler arasındaki etkileşimi göz önünde bulundurarak sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı teşvik eden stratejiler geliştirmek açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada WoS veri tabanında taranan 2001-2023 döneminde yayınlanmış konuyla ilgili 510 adet makale için bibliyometrik analiz uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, ilgili makalelerde en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler CO2 emisyonları, ekonomik büyüme, DYY ve yenilenebilir enerjidir. Shahbaz, M., Hao, Y., Acheampong, Ao., Paramati, Sr. ve Dong, K. gibi yazarlar konuyla ilgili en fazla makaleyi üretmiş olup, Çin makale çalışmalarında en fazla iş birliği yapılan ülke olmuştur. En çok atıf alan makaleler Çin, ABD ve Malezya'da üretilmiş olup, en çok atıf alan ilk üç makale Tamazian vd., 2009; Balsalobre-Lorente vd., 2018; ve Jalil ve Feridun, 2011'dir. Yeni ortaya çıkan temalar ise cdm (temiz kalkınma mekanizması) projeleri, ormansızlaşma, kalkınma yayılımları, salınım azaltma teknolojisi, karbon kaçağı, kulüp yakınlaşması, difüzyon şeklinde olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Etik Beyan

Çalışmada ikincil veriler kullanıldığı için etik kurul belgesi gerekmemektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Abbasi, M.A., Nosheen, M., & Rahman, H.U. (2023). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in asian countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 49270–49289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25548-x
  • Akçay, S., & Karasoy, A. (2018). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve karbondioksit emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73(2): 501– 526.
  • Al-Mulali, U. (2012). Factors affecting CO2 emission in the middle east: A panel data analysis. Energy, 44: 564–569.
  • Al-Nimer, M., Kayed, S., Ullah, R., Khan, N.U., & Khattak, M.S. (2022). Mapping the research between foreign direct ınvestment and environmental concerns; where are we and where to go? Sustainability, 14(24):16930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416930
  • Apergis, N., Pinar, M., & Unlu, E. (2023). How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30, 14680–14692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Asghari, M. (2013). Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences, 1(6), 92–100.
  • Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018). How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?, Energy Policy, 113(C), 356–367.
  • Bashir, M.F. (2022). Discovering the evolution of pollution haven hypothesis: A literature review and future research agenda. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29, 48210–48232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20782-1
  • Behera, S.R., & Dash, D.P. (2017). The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct ınvestment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 96–106.
  • Bilgen Karakurt, S. (2019). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve çevre: Türkiye için kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi testi, [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi].
  • Blanco, L., Gonzalez, F., & Ruiz, I. (2013). The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 41(1), 104–121.
  • Çınar, S., Yılmazer, M., & Fazhlar, T.A. (2012). Kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin ticareti ve çevre: gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler karşılaştırması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(2), 212–226.
  • Demir, H., & Erigüç, G. (2018). Bibliyometrik bir analiz ile yönetim düşünce sisteminin incelenmesi. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.395214
  • Doytch, N. & Uçtum, M. (2016). Globalization and the environmental impact of FDI. City University of New York Economics Working Papers 12. https://academicworks.cuny .edu/gc_econ_wp/12/.
  • Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.
  • Güner, İ. (2019). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma çerçevesinde doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve Co2 ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği, [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi].
  • Hamid, K. (2016). Is foreign direct ınvestment a cause of environmental degradation in Pakistan? An ARDL approach to cointegration. Journal of Management and Research, 3(2): 60–76.
  • Huang, Y., Chen, X., Zhu, H., Huang, C., & Tian, Z. (2019). The heterogeneous effects of FDI and foreign trade on CO2 emissions: Evidence from China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1–14.
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
  • Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 33, 284–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003
  • Karasoy, A. (2015). Karbondioksit salımı ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlarla ilişkisi (1974-2012 Türkiye Örneği). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi].
  • Kaymak, H. (2005). Yabancı doğrudan yatırımları artırmak için teşvikler gerekli ve/veya yeterli mi?, Maliye Dergisi, 149, 74–104.
  • Kim, S-E., & Seok, J. H. (2023). The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions considering economic development: Evidence from South Korea. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2122538
  • Klivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emis consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct ınvestment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595–606.
  • Lee, J.W. (2013). The contribution of foreign direct ınvestment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy, 55, 483–489.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root test in panel data asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
  • Mert, M., & Bölük, G. (2016). Do foreign direct ınvestment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? new evidence from a panel ARDL approach to kyoto annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23(21), 21669–21681.
  • Ojewumi S.J., & Akinlo, A.E. (2017). Foreign direct ınvestment, economic growth and environmental quality in sub-saharan Africa: A dynamic model analysis. African Journal of Economic Review, 5(1), 48–68.
  • Ozkan, O., Coban, M.N., Iortile, I.B. vd. (2023). Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve, pollution haven, and pollution halo hypotheses with carbon efficiency in China: A dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 68163–68176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26671-5
  • Öztürk, Z., & Öz, D. (2016). The relationship between energy consumption, ıncome, foreign direct ınvestment, and CO2 emissions: The case of Turkey. Çankırı Karatekin Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 269–288.
  • Pao, H.T., & Tsai, C.M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from A Panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.
  • Rafindadi, A.A., Muye, I.M., & Kaita, R.A. (2018). The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25, 126–137.
  • Seker, F., Ertugrul, H.M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct ınvestment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347–356.
  • Shaari, M.S., Hussain, N.E., Abdullah, H., & Kamil, S. (2014). Relationship among foreign direct ınvestment, economic growth and CO2 emission: A panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 706–715.
  • Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q.M.A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109-121.
  • Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Abbas, F., & Anis, O. (2015). Does foreign direct ınvestment ımpede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Economics, 51, 275–287.
  • Sahin, D. (2018). Asya ülkelerinde CO2 emisyonu, doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları, ekonomik büyüme ve enerji tüketimi ilişkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(3): 210–218.
  • Şahinöz, A., & Fotourehchi, Z. (2014). Kirlilik emisyonu ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları: Türkiye için “kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi” testi. Sosyoekonomi, 10(21): 187–210.
  • Santos, A., & Forte, R. (2021). Environmental regulation and FDI attraction: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 8873–8888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11091-6
  • Su, L., Yu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Global trends of carbon finance: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15(8):6784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086784
  • Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries, Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253.
  • Tamboğa, İ. (2019). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının çevre üzerinde etkisi: Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi çerçevesinde analizi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi].
  • Trinh, N.T.H. (2022). Bibliometric analysis to assess the relationship between foreign direct ınvestment, environmental emissions, and green economy, 29 August 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1986614/v1
  • Turzo, T., Marzi, G., Favino, C., & Terzani, S. (2022). Non-financial reporting research and practice: Lessons from the last decade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131154.
  • Uche, E., Omoke, P. C., Silva-Opuala, C., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Re-estimating the pollution haven–halo hypotheses for Brazil via a machine learning procedure. Journal of International Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3868
  • Xue, J., & Liu, Y. (2022) A bibliometric analysis of carbon finance based on web of science (WoS). American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.1212100.
  • Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Cooke, F.L. (2022). Low-carbon economy and policy implications: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29, 65432–65451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20381-0
  • Yaylalı, M, Dogan, E.M., Yılmaz, V.M., & Karaca, Z. (2015). The examination of relationship between foreign direct ınvestments and carbondioxide emissions in Turkey with ARDL approach. Alphanumeric Journal, 3(2), 107–112.
  • Yılmaz, G. (2015). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye ve Co2 emisyonu ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği (1974-2010). [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, T.C. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi].
  • Yılmaz, T., Zeren, F., & Koyun, Y. (2017). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlar, ekonomik büyüme ve karbondioksit emisyonu ilişkisi: BRICS ve MINT ülkeleri üzerinde ekonometrik bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1235–1254.
Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Finans
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

İsmail Fatih Ceyhan 0000-0002-4314-7374

Bichara Toiha Bu kişi benim 0009-0001-4056-3591

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Nisan 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi 29 Nisan 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ceyhan, İ. F., & Toiha, B. (2024). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Çevresel Etkisi: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 12(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.1423924