Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Pilot Ölçekli Mezofilik Kesikli Anaerobik Reaktörde Peynir Altı Suyu Arıtımı ve Biyogaz Üretimi

Year 2011, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 28 - 32, 22.03.2012

Abstract

Bu çalışmada peynir altı sularının anaerobik arıtımı ve arıtım sırasında oluşan yenilenebilir bir enerji kaynağı olan metan gazı üretim verimi araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, asidik özellikte peynir altı suyu ile beslenen 70 l çalışma hacmine sahip bir ardışık kesikli anaerobik reaktör (ASBR) kullanılmıştır. Reaktör 1,231 g TOK/gün (toplam organik karbon) organik yükleme ile 15 günlük hidrolik bekletme süresi (HRT) ile çalıştırılmış olup, arıtılabilirlik çalışmaları süresince reaktör sıcaklığı 35 °C’de sabit tutulmuştur. Reaktör performansı; toplam organik karbon giderimi, asetik asit üretimi ve metan üretim verimi açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Reaktördeki toplam organik karbon % 83.3 oranında giderilmiştir. Elde edilen maksimum asetik asit miktarı 900 mgL-1, biyogaz üretim verimi 0.19 L.L-1.gün-1 oluşan toplam biyogaz hacmi ise 19 l olarak elde edilmiştir

References

  • APHA ,1998. “Standart Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, American Public Health Association, 20th Edition, Washington D.C., 5-13
  • Azbar N., ve Speece R. E. 2001. Two-phase, Two-Stage and single-stage anaerobic process comparison. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 127 (3):240-248
  • Cavinato, C., Bolzonella, D. 2009. Bio-hythane production by thermophilic two-phase anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Preliminary results. Icheap-9: 9th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering, Pts 1- 3. S.Pierucci.
  • Dareioti, M. A., Dokianakis, S. N., Stamatelatou, K., Zafiri, C., and Kornaros, M. 2009 Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of agroindustrial wastewaters under mesophilic conditions in a two-stage process, Desalination 248 (1–3) pp. 891–906
  • Demirel, B., and Yenigün, O. 2002. Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 77, 743-755.
  • Demirel, B., Yenigün, O., and Onay, T. 2005. Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review, Process Biochemistry, 40, 2583-2595. co-digestion of olive mill wastes in semi-continuous digesters at mesophilic temperature. Bioresource Technology 101(6): 1628-1634
  • Ghaly, A. E., Ramkumar D. R. 1999 Controlling the pH of Acid Cheese Whey in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digester with Sodium Hydroxide, Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 21: 6, 475 — 502
  • Goldstein, J. 2004. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and electrical power costs,
  • BioCycle,45, 10, 35-37.
  • Guerrero, L., Omil, F., Mendez, R., and Lema, J.M. 1999. Anaerobic hydrolysis and acidogenesis ofwastewaters from food industries with high content of organic solids and protein, Water Res., 33, 3281-3290.
  • Guerrero, L., Montalvo, S. 2009. "Performance evaluation of a two-phase anaerobic digestion process of synthetic domestic wastewater at ambient temperature." Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part a- Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 44(7): 673-681
  • Li, R. P., S. L. Chen . 2010. Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Dairy Manure in a Two-Phase Digestion System. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160(2): 643-654.
  • Malaspina, F.,Cellamare, C.M., Stante L., Tilche A., 1996. Anaerobic treatment of cheese whey with a down flow-up flow hybrid reactor.BioresourTechnol;55:131e9.
  • Mawson, A. J. 1994, Bioconversion for whey utilization and waste abatement, Bioresour Technol 47 pp. 195–203
  • Mccartyi, P.L. 2001 The development of anaerobic treatment and its future. Water Sci Technol , 44:149–56.
  • Mcgrath, R.J. and Mason, I.G. 2004. An observational method for the assessment of biogas production from an anaerobic waste stabilisation pond treating farm dairy wastewater, Biosystems Eng., 87, 4, 471-478.
  • Mockaitis, G., Ratusznei, S. M., Rodrigues, J.A. D., Zaiat, M., Foresti, E., 2006. Anaerobic whey treatment by a stirred sequencing batch reactor(ASBR)effects of organic loading and supplemented alkalinity. JEnvironManage;79:198e206.
  • Saddoud A., Hassari I., Sayadi S., 2007. Anaerobic membrane reactor with phase separation for the treatment of cheese whey, Bioresour. Technol. 98 2102–2108.
  • Shao, P., Han, X., Ding, D., Ai, S. 2009. An Efficient Anaerobic Technology for Urban Sewage Treatment. In: 6th International Symposium of Asia-Institute-of-Urban- Environment Changchum, Peoples R. China, 529-532
  • Venetsaneas, N., Antonopoulou, G., Stamatelatou, K., Kornaros, M., Lyberatos, G., 2009. Using cheese whey for hydrogen and methane generation in a two-stage continuous process with alternative pH controlling approaches. Bioresource Technology 100 (15), 3713– 3717.
  • Yan, J.Q.,Liao, P.H., Lok, V.1988. Methane production from cheese whey.Biomass1988;17:185e202.

Treatment of Cheese Whey and Biogas Production in Pilot Scale Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor at Mesophilic Conditions

Year 2011, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 28 - 32, 22.03.2012

Abstract

In this study, anaerobic treatment of cheese whey and the quality and quantity of methane which is produced through the process, was investigated. For this purpose a 70 l anaerobic sequencing batch digester was operated at a temperature of 35 ° C and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 15 days with 1,231 g TOC/day (total organic carbon) organic loading rate. The digester performance was evaluated in terms of total organic carbon removal, acetic acid production, and methane production yield. Total organic carbon was removed as % 83.3. Obtained maximum acetic acid production, biogas production yield and amount of total biogas production were 900 mgL1 , 0.19 L.L-1.day-1 and 19 liters; respectively.

References

  • APHA ,1998. “Standart Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, American Public Health Association, 20th Edition, Washington D.C., 5-13
  • Azbar N., ve Speece R. E. 2001. Two-phase, Two-Stage and single-stage anaerobic process comparison. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 127 (3):240-248
  • Cavinato, C., Bolzonella, D. 2009. Bio-hythane production by thermophilic two-phase anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Preliminary results. Icheap-9: 9th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering, Pts 1- 3. S.Pierucci.
  • Dareioti, M. A., Dokianakis, S. N., Stamatelatou, K., Zafiri, C., and Kornaros, M. 2009 Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of agroindustrial wastewaters under mesophilic conditions in a two-stage process, Desalination 248 (1–3) pp. 891–906
  • Demirel, B., and Yenigün, O. 2002. Two-phase anaerobic digestion processes: a review, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 77, 743-755.
  • Demirel, B., Yenigün, O., and Onay, T. 2005. Anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewaters: a review, Process Biochemistry, 40, 2583-2595. co-digestion of olive mill wastes in semi-continuous digesters at mesophilic temperature. Bioresource Technology 101(6): 1628-1634
  • Ghaly, A. E., Ramkumar D. R. 1999 Controlling the pH of Acid Cheese Whey in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digester with Sodium Hydroxide, Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 21: 6, 475 — 502
  • Goldstein, J. 2004. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and electrical power costs,
  • BioCycle,45, 10, 35-37.
  • Guerrero, L., Omil, F., Mendez, R., and Lema, J.M. 1999. Anaerobic hydrolysis and acidogenesis ofwastewaters from food industries with high content of organic solids and protein, Water Res., 33, 3281-3290.
  • Guerrero, L., Montalvo, S. 2009. "Performance evaluation of a two-phase anaerobic digestion process of synthetic domestic wastewater at ambient temperature." Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part a- Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 44(7): 673-681
  • Li, R. P., S. L. Chen . 2010. Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Dairy Manure in a Two-Phase Digestion System. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 160(2): 643-654.
  • Malaspina, F.,Cellamare, C.M., Stante L., Tilche A., 1996. Anaerobic treatment of cheese whey with a down flow-up flow hybrid reactor.BioresourTechnol;55:131e9.
  • Mawson, A. J. 1994, Bioconversion for whey utilization and waste abatement, Bioresour Technol 47 pp. 195–203
  • Mccartyi, P.L. 2001 The development of anaerobic treatment and its future. Water Sci Technol , 44:149–56.
  • Mcgrath, R.J. and Mason, I.G. 2004. An observational method for the assessment of biogas production from an anaerobic waste stabilisation pond treating farm dairy wastewater, Biosystems Eng., 87, 4, 471-478.
  • Mockaitis, G., Ratusznei, S. M., Rodrigues, J.A. D., Zaiat, M., Foresti, E., 2006. Anaerobic whey treatment by a stirred sequencing batch reactor(ASBR)effects of organic loading and supplemented alkalinity. JEnvironManage;79:198e206.
  • Saddoud A., Hassari I., Sayadi S., 2007. Anaerobic membrane reactor with phase separation for the treatment of cheese whey, Bioresour. Technol. 98 2102–2108.
  • Shao, P., Han, X., Ding, D., Ai, S. 2009. An Efficient Anaerobic Technology for Urban Sewage Treatment. In: 6th International Symposium of Asia-Institute-of-Urban- Environment Changchum, Peoples R. China, 529-532
  • Venetsaneas, N., Antonopoulou, G., Stamatelatou, K., Kornaros, M., Lyberatos, G., 2009. Using cheese whey for hydrogen and methane generation in a two-stage continuous process with alternative pH controlling approaches. Bioresource Technology 100 (15), 3713– 3717.
  • Yan, J.Q.,Liao, P.H., Lok, V.1988. Methane production from cheese whey.Biomass1988;17:185e202.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Material Production Technologies
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Emre Yazar

Kevser Cırık

Özer Çınar

Publication Date March 22, 2012
Submission Date May 7, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yazar, E., Cırık, K., & Çınar, Ö. (2012). Pilot Ölçekli Mezofilik Kesikli Anaerobik Reaktörde Peynir Altı Suyu Arıtımı ve Biyogaz Üretimi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(3), 28-32.