ON-OFF VE DEĞİŞKEN ON KONTROLLÜ ZVS E-SINIFI REZONANS EVİRİCİ İÇİN Si-IGBT ve SiC-MOSFET’in KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Salih Nacar

doi:10.17780/ksujes.1524047

EN TR

COMPARISON OF Si-IGBT AND SiC-MOSFET FOR ON-OFF AND VARIABLE ON CONTROLLED ZVS CLASS-E RESONANT INVERTER

Abstract

The variation of switch stresses in ZVS class-E resonant inverters, depending on different control techniques, input voltage, and output power, limits the use of the Si MOSFET as a power switch due to its limited current-carrying capacity against breakdown voltage. Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET are used instead of Si MOSFET to counter this limitation. In this study, the operations of on-off and variable on-controlled ZVS class-E resonant inverters are examined. Si IGBT and SiC MOSFETs are used as power switches in the inverter controlled by two different control techniques. An experimental setup consisting of an input power of 372W inverter, and a control circuit is established to verify the theoretical studies. The on-off and variable on-controlled class-E resonant inverters, operating at a basic frequency of 24kHz, are tested separately using two different power switches. In the inverter where Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET are used separately, the maximum output power is 200.77W and 191.83W, respectively, while the efficiency is 53.93% and 54.57%, respectively. In the on-off controlled inverter, the efficiency is 22.15% for a minimum output power of 27.48W, whereas, in the variable on-time controlled inverter, the efficiency is 65.25% for a minimum output power of 11.69W. As a result, it is observed that the inverter efficiency decreases significantly with decreasing output power in the on-off controlled inverter, compared to the variable on-controlled inverter. Additionally, it is observed that the performance of the power switches, Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET, in terms of inverter efficiency is very close to each other in the inverter controlled separately by both control techniques.

Keywords

ON-OFF VE DEĞİŞKEN ON KONTROLLÜ ZVS E-SINIFI REZONANS EVİRİCİ İÇİN Si-IGBT ve SiC-MOSFET’in KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

ZVS E-sınıfı rezonans eviricide anahtar streslerinin; farklı kontrol tekniklerine, giriş gerilimine ve çıkış gücüne bağlı olarak değişmesi dayanma gerilimine karşı taşıyabilecekleri akım değeri sınırlı olan Si MOSFET’in güç anahtarı olarak kullanımını sınırlandırmaktadır. Bu sınırlandırmaya karşı Si MOSFET yerine Si IGBT ve SiC MOSFET kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada on-off ve değişken on kontrollü ZVS E-sınıfı rezonans eviricilerin çalışmaları incelenmiştir. İki farklı kontrol tekniği ile kontrol edilen eviricide güç anahtarı olarak Si IGBT ve SiC MOSFET kullanılmıştır. Teorik çalışmaları doğrulamak için giriş gücü 372W olan eviriciden ve kontrol devresinden oluşan deney düzeneği kurulmuştur. Temel çalışma frekansı 24kHz olan on-off ve değişken on kontrollü E-sınıfı rezonans evirici iki farklı güç anahtarı ile ayrı ayrı test edilmiştir. Si IGBT ve SiC MOSFET'in ayrı ayrı kullanıldığı eviricide maksimum çıkış gücü sıra ile 200,77W ve 191,83W iken verim değeri sıra ile %53,93 ve %54,57’dir. On-off kontrollü eviricide minimum çıkış güç değeri 27,48W için verim %22,15 iken değişken on kontrollü eviricide minimum güç değeri 11,69W için verim %65,25’tir. Sonuç olarak on-off kontrollü eviricide azalan çıkış gücü ile evirici veriminin değişken on kontrollü eviriciye göre oldukça fazla azaldığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca her iki kontrol tekniği ile ayrı ayrı kontrol edilen eviricide güç anahtarları Si IGBT ve SiC MOSFET’in evirici verimi yönünden performanslarının birbirine oldukça yakın olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supporting Institution

Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi

Project Number

BAP-21-1003-011

Thanks

Bu çalışma Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi (BANÜ) Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi tarafından desteklenmiştir (Proje Numarası: BAP-21-1003-011). Değerli destekleri için BANÜ’ye teşekkür ederim.

References

Albanna, A., Malburg, A., Anwar, M., Guta, A., & Tiwari, N. (2016, June). Performance comparison and device analysis Between Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET. 2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC) (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC.2016.7520242
Celentano, A., Pareschi, F., Rovatti, R., & Setti, G. (2023). A zero-transient dual-frequency control for class-E resonant DC-DC converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38 (2), 2105-2114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2022.3208816
Chakkuchan, P., Charoenwiangnuea, P., Chudjuarjeen, S., Rattanaudompisut, A., Jaito, K., & Pichaicherd, A. (2024, March). Parallel class-E resonant inverters with a common EMI filter for domestic induction cooker. 2024 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON 2024) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Corti, F., Reatti, A., Wu, Y. H., Czarkowski, D., & Musumeci, S. (2021). Zero voltage switching condition in class-E inverter for capacitive wireless power transfer applications. Energies, 14 (4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14040911
He, L., Huang, X., & Cheng, B. (2023). Robust class E2 wireless power transfer system based on parity-time symmetry. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38 (4), 4279-4288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2022.3230852
Karafil, A. (2023). Thinned-out controlled IC MPPT algorithm for class E resonant inverter with PV system. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14 (2023), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101992
Khodadoost, M., Hayati, M., & Abbasi, H. (2023). Investigation of temperature variations on a class-E inverter and proposing a compensation circuit to prevent harmful effects on biomedical implants. Scientific Reports, 4017 (2023), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31076-y
Komiyama, Y., Matsuhashi, S., Zhu, W., Mishima, T., Ito, Y., Uematsu, T., Nguyen, K., & Sekiya, H. (2021). Frequency-modulation controlled load-independent class-E inverter. IEEE Access, 9 (2021), 144600-144613. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3121781

Li, Y., & Ruan, X. (2022). Output current limitation for on-off controlled very-high-frequency class E DC-DC converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 69 (11), 11826-11831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2021.3116594
Mangkalajarn, S., Ekkaravarodome, C., Sukanna, S., Bilsalam, A., Jirasereeamongkul, K., & Higuchi, K. (2019, February). Comparative study of Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET in optimal operation class-E inverter for domestic induction cooker. 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C 2019) (). IEEE.
Nacar, S., Öncü, S., & Bal, G. (2021). Comparison of control techniques for series resonant converter. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part: C Tasarım ve Teknoloji, 9 (2), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.908600
Nacar, S., Öncü, S., & Kayfeci, M. (2022). Induction heated metal hydride tube for hydrogen storage system. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 28 (5), 676-680. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2021.97692
Niefnecker, P., Simon, M., Salich, S., & Pforr, J. (2017, November). Comparison of switching devices for a zero-current switched class E based automotive inductive charging converter system. 2017 19th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’17 ECCE Europe) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Oh, Y., Yeon, J., Kang, J., Galkin, I., Oh, W., & Cho, K. (2021). Sensorless control of voltage peaks in class-E single-ended resonant inverter for induction heating rice cooker. Energies, 14 (4545), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154545
Ribas, J., Quintana-Barcia, P. J., Cardesin, J., Calleja, A. J., & Corominas, E. L. (2018). LED series current regulator based on a modified class-E resonant inverter. IEEE Transactions in Industrial Electronics, 65 (12), 9488-9497. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2822618
Sarnago, H., Burdio, J. S., & Lucia, O. (2023). Dual-output extended-power-range quasi-resonant inverter for induction heating appliances. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38 (3), 3385-3397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2022.3226497
Sevim, E., & Çetin, E. (2022). The performance comparison of the SiC and Si mosfets used in the 3-phase brushless DC motor drives for electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, 6 (4), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech
Sivkov, O., Novak, M., & Novak, J. (2018, December). Comparison between Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET Inverters for AC Motor Drive. 2018 18th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME), (pp. 1-5)
Wang, Y., Li, F., Qiu, Y., Gao, S., Guan, Y., & Xu, D. (2019). A single-state LED driver based on flyback and modified class-E resonant converters with low-voltage stress. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66 (11), 8463-8473. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2890502
Xu, J., Tong, Z., & Rivas-Davila, J. (2022). 1 kW MHz wideband class E power Amplifier. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, 3 (2022), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJPEL.2022.3146835
Yalçın, S., Göksu, T., Kesler, S., & Bingöl, O. (2020). Determination of conducted EMI in SiC based dual active bridge converter. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, 8 (4), 241-244. https://doi.org/10.18100/ijamec.801730
Yamamoto, A., Omori, H., Fukuda, K., Michikoshi, H., Kimura, N., Morizane, T., & Nakaoka, M. (2017, October). Optimum design of a new single-ended wireless EV charger and comparative thermal evaluation of SiC-MOSFET and Si-IGBT. 2017 19th International Conference on Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (EDPE) (pp. 76-81). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDPE.2017.8123259
Zhang, L., Yuan, X., Wu, X., Shi, C., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Performance evaluation of high-power SiC MOSFET modules in comparison to Si IGBT modules. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 34 (2), 1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2018.2834345
Zhang, D., Lu, L., Song, W., Min, R., Tong, Q., Zhang, Q., Peng, H., & Zhou, K. (2023). Optimal duty ratio assisted PFM control for VHF isolated class E DC-DC converter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 38 (12), 15467-15480. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2023.3317910
Zhao, T., Wang, J., Huang, A. Q., & Agarwal, A. (2007, September). Comparisons of SiC MOSFET and Si IGBT based motor drive systems. 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Annual Meeting (pp. 331-335). https://doi.org/10.1109/07IAS.2007.51

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Circuits and Systems

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Salih Nacar ^*
0000-0003-4843-9648
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 3, 2025

Submission Date

July 29, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 28, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 28 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1524047

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA76LE68UU

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Nacar, S. (2025). ON-OFF VE DEĞİŞKEN ON KONTROLLÜ ZVS E-SINIFI REZONANS EVİRİCİ İÇİN Si-IGBT ve SiC-MOSFET’in KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(2), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1524047