P25 METODU İLE KAHRAMANMARAŞ YAPI STOĞUNUN İNCELENMESİ

Ökkeş Alper Erşahan; Mehmet Metin Köse; Sila Avğın

doi:10.17780/ksujes.621333

TR EN

P25 METODU İLE KAHRAMANMARAŞ YAPI STOĞUNUN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada Kahramanmaraş ilindeki yapı stoğunun hızlı değerlendirme yöntemi ile incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Kısa sürede birçok yapının deprem güvenliği hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak amacıyla yapı stoğunun incelenmesi hızlı değerlendirme yöntemlerinden biri olan P25 hızlı değerlendirme yöntemi ile yapılmıştır. Kahramanmaraş ilinde bulunan kamu binalarından ve özel binalardan ildeki bütün binaları temsil edecek şekilde 342 adet bina seçilmiştir. İncelemede binaların 100 üzerinden puanlamaya tabi tutarak 25 puanın altındaki binalar çok riskli gruba; 25 ila 35 puan arasındaki binalar, ayrıntılı inceleme bandında; 35 puandan yüksek binalar az riskli grupta değerlendirilmiştir. İncelenen 342 adet binadan 100 tanesi çok riskli grupta 121 tanesi ayrıntılı inceleme bandında 121 tanesi az riskli grupta çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hızlı değerlendirme,Kahramanmaraş yapı stoğu,P25 Methodu

Kaynakça

ATC-21 : Applied Technology Council. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington DC.
Athanassiadou C J, Penelis G G, and Kappos A J (1994) “Seismic Response of Adjacent Buildings with Similar or Different Dynamic Chracteristics”, Earthquake Spectra, 10(2):293-317.
Bal, İ. E., Ozdemir, Z. (2006) “The Adverse Effects of Perimeter Frame Discontinuity on Earthquake Response of RC Buildings”, 7th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, October 11-13, 2006, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bal, İ.et al., 2007. “P25 Rapid Screening Method to Determine the Collpase Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 16-20 October 2007 Istanbul, Turkey.
Bal İ and et al., 2008. A New Approach For The Prelımınary Seısmıc Assessment Of Rc Buıldıngs: P25 Scorıng Method, The 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
Boduroğlu, M. Hasan et al., 2007 “'' A Screening Method for Evaluating Existing Structures '' Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering .16-20 October 2007, Istanbul. 10p.
Celik O. C., İlki A., Yalcın C., Yüksel E., October 2007 “An Experience on Rapid Assessment of Earthquake Risk of Different Type Buildings in Eastern and Western European Countries ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul.
Dogan, Meltem, 2012. P25 and Durtes Pre-evaluation Methods and Application to Damaged Buildings in 1999 Düzce Earthquake, Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.213p.

FEMA 154, 1988. Rapid Visal Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards. A Handbook, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
Gulay, Gulten et al., 2008, Calibration of P25 Scoring Method Developed for Earthquake Safety of Buildings and Pilot Zone Application, TUBITAK Project (106M278), Istanbul, 129p.
Hassan, Ahmed F. and Sozen, Mete A., Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Buildings in Regions with Infrequent Earthquakes, ACI Structural Journal, January - February 1997. 31-39,
İnel M., Bilgin H., Ozmen H. B., May 2006 “Performance Evaluation of Existing Public Buildings "TMH - Turkey Engineering News / Issue 444-4445, 4- 5.17p
Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, 1990, “Standart For Evaluation of Seismic Capacity of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, Tokyo. 8s.
Oztorun N. K., vd. 2004 “Integration of Durtes and General Purpose Finite Elements with Expert Computer Program for Rapid Detection of Structures’’ İMO Seventeenth Technical Congress and Exhibition.13s.
P. Gulkan, A. Yakut, H. Sucuoğlu, M. S. Yucemen, E. Çıtıpıtıoglu, Damage Detection Form for Engineering Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, ODTU, Ankara, (1994).
Sucuoglu H and Yazgan U (2003) “Simple Survey Procedures for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks”
Wasti ST, Ozcebe G (ed.) of Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Earth and Environmental Sciences, (29): 97-118.
Sucuoglu H., October 2007 “Determination of Earthquake Risks in Urban Building Stocks by Street Scanning Method ”Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul
Tezcan S., Bal İ. E., Ozdemir Z., Kucuk F., September 2005 “How to provide “zero Kay loss of life in earthquake?”Construction Site Construction Machinery and Architecture Magazine, Number: 232, Pg: 108-112.
Yakut A., 2012 “Rapid Seismic Assessment Procedures for Turkish Building Stock” Seismic Engineering Research Infrastructures for European Synergies, Series Workshop Role of Research Infrastructures in Seismic Rehabilitation, February 2012, Istanbul.65p
Youd T L, Iddriss I M, Andrus R D, Arango I, Castro G, Christian J T, Dobry R, Liam Finn W D, Harder L F, Hynes M E, Ishihara K, Koester J P, Liao S S C, Marcuson II W F, Martin G R, Mitchell J K, Moriwaki Y, Power M S, Robertson P K, Seed R B, and Sotokoe K H (2001) “Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127(10):817-833.
Tuysuz, Selim, 2007. Determination of Breakdown Risk of Reinforced Concrete Buildings by Rapid Assessment Methods: P25 Scoring Method, Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul.120p.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

İnşaat Mühendisliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ökkeş Alper Erşahan
0000-0002-2934-2878
Türkiye

Mehmet Metin Köse ^*
0000-0002-7462-1577
Türkiye

Sila Avğın
0000-0003-4102-7747
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Mart 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

17 Eylül 2019

Kabul Tarihi

29 Ocak 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.621333

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA93HG35EA

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Erşahan, Ö. A., Köse, M. M., & Avğın, S. (2020). P25 METODU İLE KAHRAMANMARAŞ YAPI STOĞUNUN İNCELENMESİ. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.621333