Araştırma Makalesi

GÜNCEL SANATTA BİR ÜRETİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK ÇEKİŞMELİ ÜRETKEN AĞLAR

Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 3 Haziran 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS AS A PRACTICE IN CONTEMPORARY ART

Abstract

Generative models have achieved impressive results in image generation in recent years. While significant developments in the field of artificial intelligence have influenced a wide range of applications, they have also sparked many artistic debates. In this study, we adapted the DCGAN model, a type of generative adversarial network, for image generation and criticism to draw attention to the problems of artificial intelligence applications to artistic creativity and to question the ability of artificial intelligence to achieve human creativity and obscure the replacement of artists. To train the model, we scanned our own original paintings and created the dataset using data augmentation techniques. The generated images were critiqued with an artist's eye. As a result of the evaluation of the generated images, a discussion emerged on how to define the relationship between creativity and production and where the limits of artificial intelligence lie in relation to artistic production. In this context, we focused on the view that artificial intelligence and human intelligence are not opposites and often serve the same purpose and that artificial intelligence can be positioned as a tool that optimizes the production process of paintings.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Agnese, J., Herrera, J., Tao, H., & Zhu, X. (2020). A survey and taxonomy of adversarial neural networks for text‐to‐image synthesis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(4), e1345.
  2. Artut, S., (2019). Yapay Zekâ Olgusunun Güncel Sanat Çalışmalarındaki Açılımları. İnsan&İnsan, Yıl/6, Sayı/22, Güz/2019, 767-783.
  3. Baudrillard, J. (2010). Sanat Komplosu. Elçin Gen, Işık Ergüden (Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Berger, J. (2014). Görünüre Dair Küçük Bir Teoriye Doğru Adımlar. Bülent Somay (Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  4. Cai, Q., Ma, M., Wang, C., & Li, H. (2023). Image neural style transfer: A review. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 108, 108723.
  5. Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226.
  6. Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 18(2), 1-22.
  7. Dall-e. (2023). https://openai.com/dall-e-3, Son erişim: 7 Kasım 2023.
  8. Dörfler, V., (2023). Yöneticiler İçin Yapay Zeka. Cihan Altay (Çev.). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Görüntü İşleme , Derin Öğrenme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Dilara Karakaş Tabak
0000-0002-5476-081X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

3 Haziran 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Kasım 2023

Kabul Tarihi

22 Aralık 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çiftçi, S., & Karakaş Tabak, D. (2024). GÜNCEL SANATTA BİR ÜRETİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK ÇEKİŞMELİ ÜRETKEN AĞLAR. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(2), 415-425. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1391608

Cited By