Are The Mud Brick Structures Very Weak Against Earthquake? What Are The Advantages and Disadvantaged of Them?

Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 5 Haziran 2016
  • Hanifi Binici
  • Muhammed Durgun
  • Yavuz Yardım
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi Kapak
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
PDF İndir
EN TR

Are The Mud Brick Structures Very Weak Against Earthquake? What Are The Advantages and Disadvantaged of Them?

Abstract

The most of the mud brick buildings were partially or fully damaged at the earthquake in Elazig/Turkey on March 8, 2010 and 41 people die. Questions were rose after this earthquake by the public; why these structures were destroyed? Are the mud brick structures very weak against earthquake? Satisfy answers have to be found for these equations. Although the application of this construction material has commonly used, advantages, disadvantages and strengthening techniques of the mud bricks are still concern to be explored. After earthquake at the rural area of Bingol, It was observed that main damages and casualties were caused by heavy stones used at mud brick constructions. The earthquake damaged could be minimized by using fiber reinforced mud bricks instead of the heavy stones. In this study, advantages, disadvantages and mechanical properties of mud bricks were investigated. Fiber plastic and textile fibers were used as strengthening material while pumice, lime and cement were used as binding agent for the mud brick used in this study. It was found that usage of the fiber reinforced mud bricks has advantages of energy saving, cost-effective and better mechanical properties. Key Words: Earthquake, Mud Brick Buildings, Fiber, Strength

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Işık B., Ekim 2000., Türkiye’de kerpiç yapı kültürü ve Alçı ile stabilize edilen kerpiç-alker yapılar, İTÜ,Mimarlık Fak., İstanbul.
  2. 2. Binici H., Çağdaş Fiber Kerpiç Üretimi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi, Proje No: MMF2002BAP58, Adana.
  3. 3. Özener H., Doğru A., Eodezik Ve Sismik Verilerden Yararlanarak Kabuk Deformasyonu Alanının Belirlenmesi, TMMOB Harita Ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 12. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel Ve Teknik Kurultayı 11-15 Mayıs 2009, Ankara.
  4. 4. Ersoy U., 1992., Erzincan Depremi ve Betonarme Yapılar.13 Mart 1992, Erzincan Depremi Mühendislik Raporu, İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası, Ankara.
  5. 5. Bayülke N., 1989., Depreme Dayanıklı Yapı Tasarımı, İzmir, S:31, Teknik Yay, Ankara.
  6. 6. ODTÜ, TMMO, İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası, Ankara Şubesi., Aralık 1995.,1 Ekim 1995 Dinar Depremi Mühendislik Raporu, Ankara.
  7. 7. Işık B., 2000., GAP bölgesinde Yeni Gözeli Köyü örneğinde konut duvarında tuğla yerine alçılı kerpiç (Alker) kullanılmasının yıllık enerji kullanımına ve hava kirliliğine etkisi, GAP Çevre 2000 Kongresi, Harran.
  8. 8. Işık B., Boduroğlu H., 1999., Özdemir P., Earthquakes Aspects of Gypsum Stabilised Earth (Alker) Constraction for housing in the Southeast (GAP) Area of Turkey, Disaster Prevention Management, Workshop, Ankara.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Hanifi Binici

Muhammed Durgun

Yavuz Yardım

Yayımlanma Tarihi

5 Haziran 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ocak 2011

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2010 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.52504

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79MA52AE

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex
APA
Binici, H., Durgun, M., & Yardım, Y. (2016). Are The Mud Brick Structures Very Weak Against Earthquake? What Are The Advantages and Disadvantaged of Them? Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.52504